The Balanced Scorecard – Beyond Performance Measurement
Management without measurement is, needless to say, one of the biggest strategic mistakes an organization could commit. But what about measurement without management? Too often, one comes across references to the Balanced Scorecard as a performance measurement framework. In my opinion, that is akin to calling Six Sigma “a defect control device”. A better description of the BSC would be as a metrics-based strategic management system. A majority of organizations today are riding on the BSC bandwagon – but only a few of them have achieved the dramatic results that Kaplan and Norton envisaged.
Trent Limited, the retail arm of the Tata Group, opened its first store – Westside – in 1998 when the retail business in India was still in the fledgling state. By 2001, its annual growth rate had exceeded 100%. But the group realized that there was no place for complacency – to sustain and stabilize this growth, they needed to clearly articulate a common strategy for the entire organization. Trent needed a performance management system that went beyond financial measures and analyzed other critical factors like customer satisfaction an efficiency of internal operations. The BSC, with its four-dimensional model, double-loop feedback and strategy map, came up as the perfect option. The first step was to get a cross-functional team to work on putting together the strategy map. This process enabled them to identify strategic objectives and ensure that the entire management team was on the same “strategic wavelength”. The team defined their financial objectives – short term and long term – and went on to identify ways to achieve these by considering all the four BSC perspectives. These solutions were further broken down into specific, measurable and time-bound action plans which are still reviewed on a regular basis.
While monitoring its strategic action plans, Trent hit upon a well-known but oft-ignored management dictum – listen to your customers and employees. The company’s customer relationship team hit the shop floor, literally, to see what the customer really wanted. This hands-on knowledge was behind the whopping success of Trent’s homegrown, customized brands in its stores – particularly Westside. Simultaneously, they tackled the problem of high attrition – retail’s biggest bane – by designing a unique coaching initiative which has now become the training benchmark for the entire Tata Group. Trent made spectacular improvements in customer satisfaction, employee retention and profitability within four years of implementing the BSC – a feat that got the company a mention in the Balance Scorecard Hall of Fame.
The writing on the wall: If you want to reap real benefits from BSC, be prepared for the long haul. If you are looking for an organizational “ruler” – an instrument for one-time measurement – maybe you should look elsewhere.
Tags: a unique coaching initiative which has now become the t, Balanced Scorecard, Balanced Scorecard in Retail, BSC, employee retention and profitability within four years, improvements in customer satisfaction, Performance Management System, Retail Business in India, The BSC with its four-dimensional model; double-loop fe, the problem of high attrition in retail
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
Monday, June 30, 2008 at 10:13 pm
I couldn’t agree more! My company, ActiveStrategy, provides on-demand software for Balanced Scorecard deployment, and we find that if executives aren’t bought into the idea of the Balanced Scorecard as a management system, the project is going to fail. We stress constant, on-going Business Reviews as a means of ensuring long-term results. It’s important for every employee to be held accountable for the things a company is measuring on a BSC, and we find that monthly Business Reviews are the best way to make sure that sticks!
Tuesday, July 8, 2008 at 6:43 am
[...] Suresh worries about metrics without management and tells how Trent Limited, the retail arm of the Tata Group, used the Balanced Scorecard to [...]
Thursday, July 10, 2008 at 7:25 am
I have observed that in several organizations, the biggest benefit of BSC implementation is not improved operational efficiency or increased profitability; it is not even better-defined strategic goals. The single greatest gain that emerges from the entire BSC exercise is a newfound coherence and harmony in terms of the organization’s vision and objectives. For one, a sound BSC process usually has a highly productive “storming stage” which, as you say, ensures that all employees – not just the management team – are on the same “wavelength”. In sectors like retail, some firms have gone to the extent of involving customers at this storming stage. Another facet of coherence is that BSC establishes a veritable maze of links between the vision, financial objectives, customer-related and employee-related goals and business processes, at both strategic and operational levels. Retail is among the sectors that have benefited remarkably from BSC implementation – the best-known success story is Tesco’s Steering Wheel system based on the Balanced Scorecard.
Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Software Development Department Strategic Planning
http://chonglongchoo.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/software-development-department-strategic-planning/
Monday, November 17, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Bạn có thể tham khảo một số tài liệu về balanced scorecard theo link dưới đây:
http://nqcenter.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/balanced-scorecard/
Rgs
Wednesday, April 15, 2009 at 9:43 pm
Agree – having just concepts, strategies and ideas is not enough now, all this things should be connected to real numbers, facts, targets. The point is to do this is friendly, not spending more resources than you are going to save with this. I seems that you had Balanced Scorecard Designer software in mind when commenting on this article.